Magnuson, S., Norem, K. (1999). Challenges having degree couples for the commuter marriage ceremonies: Insights to have people and counselors who work with these people. The household Log, seven, 125-134.
Mikulincer, Yards., Razor, P. R. (2003). The newest accessory behavioural system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and social procedure. Into the Meters. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances for the experimental personal psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 53-152). New york: Academic Push.
Pistole, Meters. C. (2003). When you look at the P. Erdman T. Caffery (Eds.), Attachment and you can friends options: Abstract, empirical, and you can therapeutic relatedness (pp. 117-137). Ny: Brunner-Routledge.
Sahlstein, Elizabeth. M. (2004). Relating well away: Negotiating being together with her and being apart in the much time-range matchmaking. Journal out-of Personal and personal Matchmaking, 21, 689-710.
Schwebel, An excellent. I., Dunn, R. L., Moss, B. F., Renner, M. A. (1992). Affairs associated with relationship balance into the geographically ent, 33, 222-230.
Spanier, G. B. (1976). Computing dyadic variations: New balances to have evaluating the grade of marriage and you may comparable dyads. Record out-of ily, 38, 15-28.
Stafford, L., Kline, S. L., Rankin, C. T. (2004). Partnered individuals, cohabiters, and you can cohabiters just who marry: A beneficial longitudinal examination of relational and you may private well-are. Diary away from Social and personal Dating, 21, 231-248.
Van Horn, K. R., Arnone, An effective., Nesbitt, K., Desilets, L., Sears, T., Giffin, Yards., Brudi, Roentgen. (1997). Real point and you may interpersonal attributes from inside the university students’ close matchmaking.